|
On Fri, 29 Oct 1999 02:29:06 +0800, Wensong Zhang wrote:
>That statements has last for 5 months, however Mike <wanger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>told me that they used the exact patch from LVS project at the end of
>this September. I haven't looked at their patch myself, because I have
>failed to download the patch from their site over ten times. The reason
>that I didn't stand up against their act after May is that I am not
>good at arguing and I would rather spend more time coding and some
>work that interest me. Anyway, I will download their patch this time,
>and check what exactly they have done.
I pulled their patch down yesterday and it is in fact, a rewrite, as
Lars pointed out. It didn't look very robust, however, it does appear
to be controllable via a /proc system. That _may_ be nice, but I think
ipvsadm works well enough for us.
Mike
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Wangsmo Red Hat, Inc
"I've seen this before in Montana! Its snowing, nobody lick a flag
pole" -- Peggy Hill
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
