|
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999, Jean-Francois Nadeau wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Could someone explain this ?
>
> In kernnel 2.2.1x, with a virtual interface on LO, if you set a netmask of
> 255.255.255.255 on LO:0, it no longer ARP !
hmm, in the HOWTO I mention that lo:0 only works if
it has the 255.255.255.255 netmask, while all the others
(eth0:x, eth1, dummy0) work fine with 255.255.255.0
I haven't figured why yet.
Joe
>
> Would that solve the bug for DR ???
>
> JNA
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lvs-users-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: lvs-users-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
