![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Persistent Ports |
| Cc: | Peter Martin <p.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| From: | bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Fri, 3 Mar 2000 08:44:12 -0500 |
Would installing the latest LVS patch, and latest Piranha, require the
latest stable kernel ...2.2.14?
Bobby Moore Worldspan
Phone: 770.563.7362 Fax: 770.563.6406
bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Wensong Zhang
<wensong@iinc To: Peter Martin
hina.net> <p.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc:
"'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'"
03/03/00 <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
08:32 AM Subject: Re: Persistent Ports
On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Peter Martin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Firstly I must say thanks to all who replied to my query regarding
> getting this thing running, which I have succeded, all seems fine,
> BUT, and there always is a but, when I tried to enter the rules as
> Persistant rules the system says that '-p' is an 'invalid option'.
>
> I'm running vanilla RedHat 6.1, do I need to upgrade the LVS patch to
> get this as it's a new option?
>
Yeah, you need to upgrade the LVS patch, and you probably need to grap the
latest piranha if you use it as cluster manager.
Wensong
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Persistent Ports, Wensong Zhang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Issue in Failover of LVS, wanger |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Persistent Ports, wanger |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Persistent Ports, wanger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |