LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Persistent Ports

To: Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Persistent Ports
Cc: Peter Martin <p.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2000 08:44:12 -0500
Would installing the latest LVS patch, and latest Piranha, require the
latest stable kernel ...2.2.14?

Bobby Moore Worldspan
Phone: 770.563.7362 Fax: 770.563.6406
bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


                                                                                
       
                    Wensong Zhang                                               
       
                    <wensong@iinc        To:     Peter Martin                   
       
                    hina.net>            <p.martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>       
       
                                         cc:     
"'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'"  
                    03/03/00             <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>     
       
                    08:32 AM             Subject:     Re: Persistent Ports      
       
                                                                                
       
                                                                                
       





On Fri, 3 Mar 2000, Peter Martin wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Firstly I must say thanks to all who replied to my query regarding
> getting this thing running, which I have succeded, all seems fine,
> BUT, and there always is a but, when I tried to enter the rules as
> Persistant rules the system says that '-p' is an 'invalid option'.
>
> I'm running vanilla RedHat 6.1, do I need to upgrade the LVS patch to
> get this as it's a new option?
>

Yeah, you need to upgrade the LVS patch, and you probably need to grap the
latest piranha if you use it as cluster manager.

Wensong








<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>