LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Newbie Questions

To: Kevin Goddard - System Admin <systemadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Newbie Questions
Cc: "lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ratz <ratz@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 04 May 2000 15:51:05 +0200
Hi Kevin,

I try to answer as much as I can.

Kevin Goddard - System Admin wrote:
> 
> Unlike the subject suggests, I am not a complete Newbie, actually far from 
> it.  What I need, however, is basic information for LVS.  Here are my 
> questions, if anyone can help or point me to the answers
> I would appreciate it.
> 1.  How many servers will one LVS Director support?  I thought I read 
> something like 8 to 1?

Actually this depends much upon the scheme you intend to use. If you are
going 
to use to NAT-approach, all replies will go back through the webserver.
This needs
much more power in terms of packet handling as if you would choose to
run your
lvs-cluster with the DR (direct routing) - appoach. It also depends upon
the HW
you are going to use and upon the estimated traffic flow expected. I can
only 
tell you some working models. I've got one director loadbalancing 20
machines 
with different OS using DR without any CPU load-increase or bottleneck
effect.
The machine is a PII-266MHZ with 128MB RAM and a selfmade script for
maintainance.
If I remember right Michael Sparks was building up something with
hundreds of 
servers, but you have to look back in the mailing list.

> 2.  What is a good hardware configuration for the LVS Director?  We are going 
> to start off with a small web farm to see how it works out, say one LVS 
> Director and three webservers.

Basically you can take any machine on which the kernel 2.2.x runs
properly, 
because the service itself is not CPU consuming. The script/tool you
will
be running to better maintain the cluster will basically need some
CPU-time.
Probably you should think about memory first, if you intend to have alot
of http-traffic.

> 3.  Do I need multiple ethernet cards?

Nope. Although you could handle different clusters with one
loadbalancer. 
I have such a director running. It serves three clients on different
net-
entities. And therefor I need multiple cards.

> 4.  Does LVS install okay on a clean install of Red Hat 6.2?  If not what is 
> a good version of Red Hat to use?

As far as I saw in the mailing list this should already be included and 
if not I think you can easily install it on a RedHat 6.2. To be honest,
I have an own homebrew for security reasons and I patch my kernel by 
hand. So I can't really tell you. But see previous messages concerning
piranha.

> 5.  What are the install steps, I tried to follow through in the HOW TO but 
> it seemed kind of chopy (though I may need to just try it once to get a feel 
> for it).

I think there is no help for a specific distribution installation, only
base kernel patching, explanation and a big FAQ section. And I think
that stuff like piranha questions should be solved by a Howto from 
RedHat.

> 6.  Are there any good companys who sell web farms running LVS yet?  VAR 
> seemed to, but they still seem to have issues following up with potential 
> customers.

What's a good company in your eyes?

> 7.  Do I need to install lvs-gui before or after LVS?  Does it install LVS as 
> well? Again I am getting lost in some of the documentation.

This is not in the documentation and I think this should also not be 
there since a lot of people write their own deamon software and
documenting
ldirectord, lvs-gui, piranha and every tool available is beyond the 
scope of the Howto. I guess the gui needs to be install afterwards, but
actually it should not make a big difference. Anyway installing a 
gui for something which isn't installed yet doesn't make any sense?

> 
> Thanks for the quick response.
> Kevin Goddard
> 

Regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>