Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself.

To:	Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself.
Cc:	lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From:	Stephen Zander <gibreel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	11 May 2000 15:37:20 -0700

>>>>> "Horms" == Horms  <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
    Horms> If the source address doesn't have a local interface - and
    Horms> it doesn't need to with the fwmark stuff, then I think so.

Local to the realserver or local to the director?

-- 
Stephen

"Good idea, O Lord!"... "'Course it's a good idea!"

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., catls Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Lars Marowsky-Bree Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Horms Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Lars Marowsky-Bree Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander <= Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Lars Marowsky-Bree Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Horms Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Lars Marowsky-Bree Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Horms Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Julian Anastasov

Previous by Date:	Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander
Next by Date:	Re: client source IP based redirection, Ratz
Previous by Thread:	Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Lars Marowsky-Bree
Next by Thread:	Re: Redhat6.1 and DR via the director itself., Stephen Zander
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]