LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: lvs bottlekneck

To: "'Cono D'Elia '" <conod@xxxxxxxx>, "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx '" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: lvs bottlekneck
From: Dan <dan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 20:38:10 -0700
 Well, I can let you know on Monday because I'm going to be testing that
particular configuration over the weekend.

-d


-----Original Message-----
From: Cono D'Elia
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 5/13/00 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: lvs bottlekneck

Getting back to my original question. Would the proposed desgin below
work?? Let me know if need to clarify.
 
Thanks,
Cono

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Cono D'Elia <mailto:conod@xxxxxxxx>  
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  
Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2000 2:16 PM
Subject: lvs bottlekneck

Hello,
 
What do you do when you reach the point where a single linux load
balancer box becomes the bottlekneck? What about configuring the DNS
entry for the www site to have multiple ips ( one for each linux load
balancer box) and to be round robin... ie...
 
 
 dns record www.xyz.com <http://www.xyz.com> : .1 .2 .3
 
 linuxloadbalancer       linuxloadbalancer       linuxloadbalancer      
.1                             .2                                .3
 
|                               |                                    |

|                               |                                    |

|                               |                                    |
realserver .10        realserver .13                  realserver .16

realserver .11        realserver .14                  realserver .17
realserver .12        realserver .15                  realserver .18
 
Can someone suggest some solutions?
 
Thanks,
Cono



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>