lvs-users
|
To: | Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Infinetely scalable DR |
Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 24 May 2000 06:32:37 +0200 |
On 2000-05-23T16:07:07, Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx> said: > I did a bad lash-up of this just now and the lash-up failed > in a way that didn't prove anything about the above conjecture. My current understanding, after having had time to read RFC793, 1123 and talk to Alan briefly, is that indeed this behaviour would violate the specs. Damn, it would have been royally cool ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx> Development HA -- Perfection is our goal, excellence will be tolerated. -- J. Yahl |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Infinetely scalable DR, Lars Marowsky-Bree |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: taking long time to connect to LVS-NAT VIP if client is inanother sub net, Madhav |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Infinetely scalable DR, Joseph Mack |
Next by Thread: | ipvsadm -Ln != ipvsadm -L -n, Christophe Massiot |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |