|
On Fri, Jun 16, 2000 at 07:54:40AM -0400, Thomas A. Morris wrote:
> I could only get it to work if I used eth0:0 instead of lo:0 for the virtual
> server interface. I posted a question about the reason for usiing lo:0, but
> nobody has yet responded. I'm using the latest patches on 2.2.15 kernel.
If the addresses that are covered by the fwmark rules and hence the
ipalias (on lo:0) are routed to the LVS host then you don't need
to put this on the ethernet interface. Otherwise you will need to
put this on the ethernet interface. I believe that in this case
you will need one IP alias on an ethernet interace per VIP. This
becomes a little tedious if you have more than one VIP.
--
Horms
|
