|
Couldn't you dump and undump those mon alerts? It might make for faster
execution time.
Alert daemons is an interesting idea. Alert daemons could sit on a
linuxdirector and constantly keep dumping information into files which could
be read by a service like mon or ldirectord. Or perhaps mon/ldirectord could
sit on a port and wait for contacts from alert daemons.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Skliarouk Peter" <skliaroukp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: Bug in mon?
> bobby.moore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Will ldirectord monitor anything else besides http on real servers?
>
> I submitted patch for ldirectord (1.11) to support connect type checks.
>
> Currently I'm using mon and even on modest check rates (20s) it slows
> down the
> computer (remember all its is perl based loading/compilation of alerts).
>
> Will somebody rewrite mon's alerts to be importable at pre-execution
> time (not spawned) to ldirectord?
>
> --
> Bye, | ICQ: 43062358
> Ari and Aglaia | Linux inside, idiot outside
>
>
>
>
|
