LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: HTTP: 1.1 [Was: IPVS v0.0.3 for kernel 2.4]

To: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: HTTP: 1.1 [Was: IPVS v0.0.3 for kernel 2.4]
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Greg Cope <gjjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2000 18:22:46 +0000
Joseph Mack wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Greg Cope wrote:
> 
> > Are you planning to add any functionality to load ballance (via LVS)
> > HTTP 1.1 Domains.
> 
> I assume you're talking about name based (rather than IP based) web
> service. If so it's already covered because LVS doesn't look at the
> application level information in the header and will just pass the connect
> request through to a reaserver which will pass the request to the
> appropriate website.

I should have explained myself better - I want IP based domains - but
get LVS to loadballance based on the application layer part of the
packet (sorry thats not the right term) - not just the ip address / port
number combo. 

Greg

> 
> Is this what you're talking about?
> 
> Joe
> 
> --
> Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>