LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: transparent proxy required?

from [Joseph Mack] [Permanent Link]
To: tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: transparent proxy required?
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:32:55 -0400 (EDT) 
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, tc lewis wrote:

> 
> does an lvs director machine need transparent proxy support in its kernel
> for direct routing to work?

no. 

transparent proxy on the director is only needed if you are accepting
packets on the director from the client by transparent proxy.

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: transparent proxy required?, Horms
Next by Date:  Re: route on non-ip interface?, Ted Pavlic
Previous by Thread:  Re: transparent proxy required?, Horms
Next by Thread:  Re: transparent proxy required?, tc lewis
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]