Re: transparent proxy required?

[tc lewis <tcl@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Joseph Mack wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, tc lewis wrote:
> > does an lvs director machine need transparent proxy support in its kernel
> > for direct routing to work?
> 
> no. 
> 
> transparent proxy on the director is only needed if you are accepting
> packets on the director from the client by transparent proxy.

ok that's what i thought.
then why isn't this working!?!?1/1
(rhetorical).
investigating more later today...

-tcl.