LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: ARP problem on duumy0

To: Shawn Cannon <SCannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: ARP problem on duumy0
Cc: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:42:00 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Shawn  Cannon wrote:

> Hi -
> 
> I have a red hat 6.2/linux 2.2.14 system with the dummy0 and multiple
> aliased interfaces (i.e. dummy0:1, dummy0:2, etc.) configured to be hidden.
> I ran the "echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/hidden" and the "echo 1 >
> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/dummyo/hidden" commands and at first this appeared

presumably this is dummy0
                        ^

> to hide the dummy0 interface and all of its aliased interfaces as well.
> However I can now ping the dummy0 interface as well as the aliases from a
> separate client machine and get a response. Doing a "more" on hidden
> returned a value of one, so this interface should still be hidden I would
> think. Running ifconfig -a shows the interface to be set to NOARP. Any ideas
> why this interface can still respond to ARP requests? Is there a way ro
> re-force the interface into a hidden state? Thanks...

This would have worked on my machine. RedHat seem to have done things to
the /proc interface and it would appear from previous postings that you
then have to run the sysctl command to make it take.

Anyone know if this is an incompatibility with the standard kernel, or is
this just some re-orthogonalisation of the commands?

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>