lvs-users
|
To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ... |
From: | Brian Edmonds <bedmonds@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | 09 Aug 2000 15:53:57 -0700 |
Ratz <ratz@xxxxxx> writes: > > Again, it all goes back to the statement: Why limit yourself? > I completely agree with you, limiting is totally wrong and also > against the linux philosophy. I say make it a well defined interface and let people write both. If they want PtP over a parallel cable let them do it, and if others want N-way directors over ethernet (or token ring or...) let them do it too. That's what removing limits is really all about. Brian. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: FW: Multi-site LVS solution, Brian Edmonds |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Repeat sequence number on TCP with SYN bit, Kyle Sparger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ..., Ratz |
Next by Thread: | Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ..., Lars Marowsky-Bree |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |