|  | 
lvs-users
 | 
| To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ... | 
| From: | Brian Edmonds <bedmonds@xxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| Date: | 09 Aug 2000 15:53:57 -0700 | 
| Ratz <ratz@xxxxxx> writes: > > Again, it all goes back to the statement: Why limit yourself? > I completely agree with you, limiting is totally wrong and also > against the linux philosophy. I say make it a well defined interface and let people write both. If they want PtP over a parallel cable let them do it, and if others want N-way directors over ethernet (or token ring or...) let them do it too. That's what removing limits is really all about. Brian. | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: FW: Multi-site LVS solution, Brian Edmonds | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Repeat sequence number on TCP with SYN bit, Kyle Sparger | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ..., Ratz | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: ideas about kernel masq table syncing ..., Lars Marowsky-Bree | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |