LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS and NT realservers

To: "Hendrik Thiel" <thiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: LVS and NT realservers
From: "Peter Martin" <p.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 11:43:20 +0100
What services do you want to load balance?  if it's just www, ftp etc. then
you can treat the real servers as any type of box, and just follow the
standard NAT procedure from the HOWTO.

Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hendrik Thiel" <thiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 11:36 AM
Subject: LVS and NT realservers


Hi everybody,

i want to build a high available, loadbalancing Cluster with NT
realservers
(not my fault). I figured out that only the NAT approach will work
with NT.
I use the Ultramonkey Package and cant really figure out the
differences of DR, NAT and
Tunneling in their docs. Their topologies sections do not talk of one
of these methods
Are their examples all for NAT or is it kinda mixed up?
Is it possible to build a HA and lb Cluster with 2 LVS Boxes
(heartbeat, ldirectord)
and 6-10 NT realservers?

I am at the beginning and really want to master the linux approach
of Loadbalancing.
I am thankful for any kind of help, and if you think this thread is not
worth to be
on the mailing list, please email me directly.

thx in advance.

Falk GmbH Internet Services

Hendrik Thiel
mobil:01702931116
Büro: 02841/9097355





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>