Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?

To:	Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?
Cc:	Jeffrey A Schoolcraft <jschoolc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From:	Thomas Proell <Thomas.Proell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 21 Sep 2000 23:22:52 +0200 (MET DST)

Hi!

> > My test machine had a gig card, through a gig switch 
> 
> ah, this is new territory.  

Hmm. We'll have a lvs with three incoming 100MBit and
one outgoing 1GBit (or 2.5 GBit?) next month.

New territroy you say? merde!

> with gig network, you're the first one to find the cpu limiting. take a bow.

What cpu do you have?



Thomas

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: NAT routing not working, (continued) Re: NAT routing not working, Bruno L. F. Cabral Re: NAT routing not working, Joseph Mack Re: NAT routing not working, Bruno L. F. Cabral ip tunnelling to lvs clusters doing direct routing with VIP?, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft RE: ip tunnelling to lvs clusters doing direct routing with VIP? (clarification), Jeffrey A Schoolcraft Re: ip tunnelling to lvs clusters doing direct routing with VIP?(clarification), Joseph Mack Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Joseph Mack RE: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Joseph Mack Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Thomas Proell <= Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Joseph Mack Re: NAT routing not working, Horms

Previous by Date:	iBGP? [Re: Route through rather than connect to possible?], Ted Pavlic
Next by Date:	Re: Real server taking over as director.., Abhay Natu
Previous by Thread:	Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Joseph Mack
Next by Thread:	Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Joseph Mack
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]