Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?

To:	Thomas Proell <Thomas.Proell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?
Cc:	Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft <jschoolc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From:	Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 22 Sep 2000 06:57:59 -0400 (EDT)

On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, Thomas Proell wrote:

> > with gig network, you're the first one to find the cpu limiting. take a bow.
> 
> What cpu do you have?

75MHz pentium 1. It keeps 100Mbps ethernet humming just fine.

Joe

--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: NAT routing not working, (continued) Re: NAT routing not working, Joseph Mack Re: NAT routing not working, Bruno L. F. Cabral ip tunnelling to lvs clusters doing direct routing with VIP?, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft RE: ip tunnelling to lvs clusters doing direct routing with VIP? (clarification), Jeffrey A Schoolcraft Re: ip tunnelling to lvs clusters doing direct routing with VIP?(clarification), Joseph Mack Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Joseph Mack RE: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Jeffrey A Schoolcraft Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Joseph Mack Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Thomas Proell Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Joseph Mack <= Re: NAT routing not working, Horms

Previous by Date:	doing both NAT and DR, I need help., Jeremy Hansen
Next by Date:	Re: setting up lvs with tunneling across networks., Joseph Mack
Previous by Thread:	Re: Direct Routing sucking up System Resources?, Thomas Proell
Next by Thread:	Re: NAT routing not working, Horms
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]