LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections to same ser

from [Joseph Mack] [Permanent Link]
To: Michael E Brown <Michael_E_Brown@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections to same server
Cc: linux-ha@xxxxxx, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 14:45:04 -0400 (EDT) 
:-(

> Possible workarounds:

>   3) Tell LVS to redirect both UDP and TCP connections to the same
> server... This would be the best solution, I think.

you can get persistance with fwmarks too. do you know if fwmarks can be
put on udp as well as tcp (I don't)?

Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: FOS seem not working normal?, Joseph Mack
Next by Date:  Re: Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections tosame server, Michael E Brown
Previous by Thread:  Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections to same server, Michael E Brown
Next by Thread:  Re: Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections to same server, Horms
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]