LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections to same ser

from [Horms] [Permanent Link]
To: Joseph Mack <mack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections to same server
Cc: Michael E Brown <Michael_E_Brown@xxxxxxxx>, linux-ha@xxxxxx, lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 10:24:26 -0700 
On Mon, Oct 23, 2000 at 02:45:04PM -0400, Joseph Mack wrote:
> 
> :-(
> 
> > Possible workarounds:
> 
> >   3) Tell LVS to redirect both UDP and TCP connections to the same
> > server... This would be the best solution, I think.
> 
> you can get persistance with fwmarks too. do you know if fwmarks can be
> put on udp as well as tcp (I don't)?

Yes, fwmarks may be put on UDP packets.

-- 
Horms
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Make zImage Error, Supin Wanna
Next by Date:  Re: Make zImage Error, Thomas Proell
Previous by Thread:  Re: Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections to same server, Joseph Mack
Next by Thread:  Re: Bug: Persistence doesn't associate TCP-->UDP connections tosame server, Michael E Brown
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]