Re: State of LVS on 2.4

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: State of LVS on 2.4
From: "David D.W. Downey" <pgpkeys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 18:48:30 -0800
I am currently working on LVS under 2.4.0. So far the problem has been
that the daemon dies for some unknown reason. At this point I am not
sure if it's me or the daemon. Since I'm not a heavy coder, I'm having
to use books and such to figure out what sections of code do what.

If you would like to work on this with me I'd be more than happy to go
over this with you.

David D.W. Downey

Pat O'Rourke wrote:
> I've been experimenting with LVS on 2.2 (both LVS-NAT and LVS-DR), but was
> considering moving to a 2.4 based environment.  Are there any major issues
> outstanding with running LVS in a 2.4 environment that one should be aware
> of?
> Any information would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks,
> Pat
> --
> Patrick O'Rourke
> 978.606.0236
> orourke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>