LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: dual CPU balancer

To: Michael E Brown <michael_e_brown@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: dual CPU balancer
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: mike@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 16:05:03 -0500 (EST)
On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Michael E Brown wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Dec 2000, Horms wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 10:58:34AM -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
> > > Is there any advantage in using a dual-CPU balancer
> > > over a single-CPU?
> > >
> > > (...and i guess this question too is a nice FAQ entry
> > > ;-) )
> >
> > The _theory_ is that under 2.2.x no and uder 2.4.x yes.
> >
> 
> Make that _reality_. In some tests I've done with FTP, I have seen
> *significant* improvements using dual and quad processors using 2.4. Under
> 2.2, there are improvements, but not astonishing ones.
> 
> Things like 90% saturation of a Gig link using quad processors, 70% using
> dual processors and 55% using a single processor under 2.4.0test. Really
> amazing improvements.

What are the percentage differences on each processor configuration
between 2.2 and 2.4?  How does a 2.2 system compare to a 2.4 system on the
same hardware?

--
Michael D. Jurney
mike@xxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>