|
I use Intel cards, since 3Com cards had once locked up
the LVS box during stress tests. Never had that problem
with Intel cards.
At 08:20 PM 12/26/00 +0000, Lorn Kay wrote:
>3com and Intel cards are a good choice. I am using both in production.
>
>See their web sites for the latest Linux driver modules which you can
>download, compile and load into your system (on Red Hat via /etc/conf.modules
>for example).
>
>--K
>>From: Florin Andrei
>>Reply-To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>To: LVS users
>>Subject: reccomended NIC
>>Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2000 10:37:08 -0800 (PST)
>>
>>I did some research on the mailing list archive, but i
>>was unable to find a match for this problem...
>>
>>I understand that system latency is a critical
>>parameter for LVS. So, a fast network interface card
>>(NIC) might be an advantage for the balancer box.
>>
>>What NICs do you reccomend for using in a LVS
>>balancer, on Intel architecture?
>>
>>Is there an FAQ for LVS? I think this question is a
>>typical FAQ entry...
>>
>>--
>>Florin Andrei
>>
>>
>>__________________________________________________
>>Do You Yahoo!?
>>Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
>>http://shopping.yahoo.com/
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
>----------
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
><http://explorer.msn.com>http://explorer.msn.com
>_______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing
>list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Send requests to
>lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx or go to
>http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
