LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: LVS Stability Kudos

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: LVS Stability Kudos
From: ratz <ratz@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:42:22 +0100
Tyrel Beede wrote:
> 
> About 6 or so months ago the corporation I worked for at the time, and
> still have a very close relationship with( the story is I graduated from
> high school and went to work there and I ended up kinda running
> everything unix related as the my boss didn't know much about the
> matter... but then after a year of working I went back to school so now
> I kinda just remote manage everything)  has been running a copy of the

I remember.

> LVS which I modified to meet the requirements that they made of the
> product.  It was just a few simple in-kernel and ipvsadm mods to support
> overflow between servers.  I have also built a web interface to generate

Well, that sounds interesting...

> reports which count users through the server and allows management of
> the servers over a web interface to the non-unix people can work with
> it.  Anyway to make a long story short we have been running with the LVS
> in place and everything has been great, no problems to speak of.
> I though it was really cool that it had been stable and I wanted to let
> the community know about it( if you want to play with it just give me an
> email, i didn't want to post a bunch of stuff).  I've also got all the

Please send it to me, ASAP :)
And send a copy to Wensong, he'll have a look at it too, I'm sure.

> additional stuff I've written for it, some of which was kinda quick and
> dirty, but it gets the job done and from all I can tell seems to be
> stable.  Also I was hoping Wensong or somebody out there would like to
> discuss adding some more scheduling algorithms, concentrating on the
> ones listed under the "To Do" section of the web site.  I'm interested
> in if or how we could use the new "stateful" firewalling code in the
> linux kernel to implement some kinda fastest response scheduling

How do you mean "stateful" firewalling? This would already exist. Tell
us more about your ideas.

> algorithm.  Anyways if anybody would like to share ideas about LVS
> development I would be more than happy to hear what you have to say...

Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz

-- 
mailto: `echo NrOatSz@xxxxxxxxx | sed 's/[NOSPAM]//g'`


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>