|
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > I expected that one of these sets of ipvsadm commands would
> > overwrite the other. It seems that persistent and non-persistent
> > connections can be made at the same time.
> >
> > Is this by design and going to stay this way?
>
> Yes, the templates we use to keep the persistence are not
> considered when scheduling packets for non-persistent connections.
I'm impressed. I expected the two lots of ipvsadm commands to tread on
each other's toes.
> Not sure what happens when VIP:0 and VIP:21 are defined persistent
> together. Didn't checked such setup :)
I'll see if I can test it
Joe
--
Joseph Mack mack@xxxxxxxxxxx
|
