Re: performance NAT versus DR ?

[Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>]

Joseph Mack wrote:
> 
> When I compared DR (using Julian's martian patch, which allowed the director
> to be the default gw for the real-servers) and NAT, at the same packet
> throughput, the load average was 5 on the NAT director and the keyboard
> and mouse weren't responding anymore, while the DR director had low load
> average (<0.1 I think) and the mouse and keyboard responded just fine. I 
> assume

        So this happened at how many Mbit/s ?

-- 
Florin Andrei