|
Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx> writes:
> Yeah, i have the same opinion - it's a good idea.
OTOH, I disagree. Some of the lists I run operate this way, but for a
technical list, there is no reason for it. If you can't filter your
mail as is, you certainly can't make use of LVS.
> I use this for lvs-list:
> Sender: lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So you've got filtering that works. What would subject tagging gain you
but messy "Re: [tag]" vs "[tag] Re:" situations, less visible space on
the subject line, and eye clutter that is entirely redundant given that
you know you're in the LVS mailbox?
Brian.
|
