LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: pirahna+tranparent proxy

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: pirahna+tranparent proxy
From: Ariel Pereira <solx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 19:23:38 -0300
On Monday 05 March 2001 10:57, Joseph Mack wrote:

> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO_1.0-12.html#s
>s12.2
> http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO_1.0-15.html
Thank you for the pointers, i'll check this out.

> the problem is that you are accepting packets on port 80 at the director
> and the real-server is expecting packets on port 3218.
> Here are some solutions and it depends a little on whether there is one IP
> involved
> (ie you're caching local webserver(s)) or many (you're caching the
> internet).
Yes, we are caching the inet.

> 1. Ask people to make requests for that IP on 3128
This is out of question, the clients are assigned automatically their ip, the 
dns ip, and the default gateway.   The gateway will be a LVS who will point 
to a squid farm.

> 2. Configure the squid to be transparent, ie to accept requests on port 80
Just tested ... but will test this again, just in case i've missed something.

> 3. use VS-NAT on the director and rewrite the ports (haven't tested this
> and the rewritting will slow access, probably the opposite of what you want
> in production, since the purpose of the squid is to speed access).
Exactly, that's why we're trying to setup this, we're looking for fast inet 
access.

Thank you for your comments and your time.

-- 
Saludos

Ariel Pereira
---------------------------------------------
SolX - Sistemas Abiertos y Conectividad con tecnología LiNUX


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>