![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969: |
| From: | "John P . Looney" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:50:16 +0000 |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:54:33PM -0500, Matthew S. Crocker mentioned:
> > LVS is not yet ported to the Zerocopy TCP/IP patches
> And that means?? Should I not use the Alan Cox patches? Would it work
> fine with a stock 2.4.2 kernel?
I don't think it works with netfilter's masquerading either.
Kate
--
When I say 'free', I mean 'free': free from bond, of chain or command:
to go where you will, even to Mordor, Saruman, if you desire. "
-- Gandalf, paraphrasing the choice between Free and Non-free software
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Matthew S. Crocker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Julian Anastasov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Matthew S. Crocker |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Julian Anastasov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |