lvs-users
|
To: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969: |
From: | "John P . Looney" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:50:16 +0000 |
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:54:33PM -0500, Matthew S. Crocker mentioned: > > LVS is not yet ported to the Zerocopy TCP/IP patches > And that means?? Should I not use the Alan Cox patches? Would it work > fine with a stock 2.4.2 kernel? I don't think it works with netfilter's masquerading either. Kate -- When I say 'free', I mean 'free': free from bond, of chain or command: to go where you will, even to Mordor, Saruman, if you desire. " -- Gandalf, paraphrasing the choice between Free and Non-free software |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Matthew S. Crocker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Julian Anastasov |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Matthew S. Crocker |
Next by Thread: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Julian Anastasov |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |