![]() |
lvs-users
|
| To: | "John P . Looney" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969: |
| Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:07:57 +0200 (EET) |
Hello,
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, John P . Looney wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:54:33PM -0500, Matthew S. Crocker mentioned:
> > > LVS is not yet ported to the Zerocopy TCP/IP patches
> > And that means?? Should I not use the Alan Cox patches? Would it work
> > fine with a stock 2.4.2 kernel?
>
> I don't think it works with netfilter's masquerading either.
Hm, more information, please!
> Kate
>
> --
> When I say 'free', I mean 'free': free from bond, of chain or command:
> to go where you will, even to Mordor, Saruman, if you desire. "
> -- Gandalf, paraphrasing the choice between Free and Non-free software
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Julian Anastasov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, John P . Looney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, John P . Looney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, John P . Looney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |