lvs-users
|
To: | "John P . Looney" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969: |
Cc: | lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: | Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:07:57 +0200 (EET) |
Hello, On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, John P . Looney wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:54:33PM -0500, Matthew S. Crocker mentioned: > > > LVS is not yet ported to the Zerocopy TCP/IP patches > > And that means?? Should I not use the Alan Cox patches? Would it work > > fine with a stock 2.4.2 kernel? > > I don't think it works with netfilter's masquerading either. Hm, more information, please! > Kate > > -- > When I say 'free', I mean 'free': free from bond, of chain or command: > to go where you will, even to Mordor, Saruman, if you desire. " > -- Gandalf, paraphrasing the choice between Free and Non-free software Regards -- Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, Julian Anastasov |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, John P . Looney |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, John P . Looney |
Next by Thread: | Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:, John P . Looney |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |