LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:

To: "John P . Looney" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bug in ip_vs_conn.c missing parameter line 969:
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:07:57 +0200 (EET)
        Hello,

On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, John P . Looney wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:54:33PM -0500, Matthew S. Crocker mentioned:
> > >   LVS is not yet ported to the Zerocopy TCP/IP patches
> > And that means??  Should I not use the Alan Cox patches?  Would it work
> > fine with a stock 2.4.2 kernel?
>
>  I don't think it works with netfilter's masquerading either.

        Hm, more information, please!

> Kate
>
> --
>  When I say 'free', I mean 'free': free from bond, of chain or command:
> to go where you will, even to Mordor, Saruman, if you desire. "
>     -- Gandalf, paraphrasing the choice between Free and Non-free software


Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>