Thanks,
The patch is on and working great. I only have a half a day's worth of
testing on it but so far so good. Here is ipvsadm -ln now.
IP Virtual Server version 0.2.8 (size=4096)
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn
InActConn
TCP 172.19.0.5:25 lc
-> 172.18.2.16:25 Masq 1 1 205
-> 172.18.2.15:25 Masq 1 1 193
-> 172.18.2.14:25 Masq 1 1 183
-> 172.18.2.13:25 Masq 1 1 206
-> 172.18.2.12:25 Masq 1 0 207
-> 172.18.2.11:25 Masq 1 0 223
-> 172.18.2.10:25 Masq 1 0 223
-> 172.18.2.9:25 Masq 1 0 227
-> 172.18.2.8:25 Masq 1 1 184
-> 172.18.2.7:25 Masq 1 1 203
-> 172.18.2.6:25 Masq 1 1 202
-> 172.18.2.5:25 Masq 1 1 165
-> 172.18.2.4:25 Masq 1 2 155
-> 172.18.2.3:25 Masq 1 0 223
-> 172.18.2.2:25 Masq 1 0 197
-> 172.18.2.1:25 Masq 1 3 164
Thank You,
Jason
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 11:16:16PM +0800, Wensong Zhang wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> Thanks for the info. It is mostly some race in state transition on SMP
> box, which leads to those negative problem.
>
> We added a simple spinlock to fix this problem, since the collision seldom
> happens, there won't be performance drawback. Please apply the attached
> patch to ipvs-0.2.8 tar ball, build and test it on your smp box.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wensong
|