LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: passive mode ftp on kernel 2.2.19

To: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: passive mode ftp on kernel 2.2.19
Cc: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 15:43:28 +0300 (EEST)
        Hello,

On Thu, 3 May 2001, Joseph Mack wrote:

> >         The fatal problems come for the passive transfers
> > when the data connection from the client must hit the LVS service.
>
> presumably the people who designed passive ftp didn't know about L4 switches.
> What is the supposed benefit of passive ftp?

        May be they know about NAT boxes without FTP support :) But the
FTP support is useful because the data connection can be marked as
slave to the command connection and by this way to avoid command
connection reconnects.

> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
> contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
> mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>