|
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 9 May 2001, Wensong Zhang wrote:
>
> > We have tested ipvs-0.2.11 and ipvs-0.2.12 for some time, haven't met
> > problems now. So, we want to jump to version 0.8.0 as ipvs stable version
> > for kernel 2.4, and we will start version 0.9.0 for new development soon.
>
> We have encountered crashes on 2.4 + ipvs-0.2 when using SMP kernels
> (including the latest versions) when we started to load-balance high-traffic
> servers (3 real servers each with ~380 active connections, total traffic of
> about 24Mbps). It crashed systematically after about 4 hours of
> working. However, it works fine with UP kernel for one week. The conenction
> table bits was (and still is) set to 18 (256K simultaneous connections).
>
Could you send me a copy of your kernel configuration, ipvs system
configuration, the oops (and the ksymoops-ed version too) if you have?
> Any hint for why this happened would be helpful (we have 800 Mhz of
> processing power unused :)
>
I seldom install ip_conntrack.o module while testing ipvs. I remember that
I used to meet some problems in testing ipvs of early 0.2.x version on SMP
while iptable_nat is enabled to masquerade internal hosts, but I didn't
trace the problem.
> In the meantime, we are kamikaze enough to use development versions in
> production (after preliminary testing :)
>
Good to hear that. :)
Regards,
Wensong
> Radu-Adrian Feurdean
> mailto: raf@xxxxxxxx
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> "If the night is silent enough you can hear a Windows NT rebooting"
>
|
