|
Horms wrote:
> I'm thinking that the best way to do this would be to merge the
> behaviour of -a and -e (-A and -E) so that if either option is used a
> new entry will be added if there is none, else the existing entry
> will be edited.
yes
I guess to maintain backwards compatibility I guess we need to
keep -e and have it do the same thing as -a. Otherwise we don't
need -e anymore.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|
