LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

RE: path mtu discovery...

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: path mtu discovery...
From: DaP <dap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 17:55:16 +0200 (CEST)
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> On Thu, 17 May 2001, DaP wrote:
> > 14:24:24.693701 10.1.1.1.443 > 192.168.3.31.3438: P 1:1449(1448) ack 19
> >     win 31856 <nop,nop,timestamp 392454 1837743> (DF)
>       You should forward this message to the Netfilter mailing list.
> What I see is that port 443 is not a part from LVS service. I don't
> know why netfilter does not forward the ICMP to the internal host.
 sorry, I pasted a bad config line, port 443 is also LVS serviced.
I have this line in the config:
TCP  217.20.134.241:443 rr
  -> 10.1.1.1:443                   Masq    1


> > there is nothing interesting in the routing cache, the 'need to
> > frag' messages do not pass, while 'dest unreachable' do:
> > 14:24:16.688657 10.1.1.121 > 10.1.1.1: icmp: 195.228.210.26 tcp
> >     port 2560 unreachable (DF) [tos 0xc0]
>       What is this? -j REJECT? 1.121 and 1.1 are on the LAN, where
> is 195.228.210.26? I don't see NAT involved here.
 really, another mistake..  ignore it..


 now I'm going to try the debug and write you my results..



--
  DaP




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>