|
Hello,
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Roberto Nibali wrote:
> > OK, won't wait for a -Z then.
>
> Mhh, I don't know, what do others like e.g. Horms, Wensong and Julian think?
> It's affecting 4 lines in the kernel and 14 lines in ipvsadm :)
Some ideas for you:
-Z -t/u VIP:VPORT - clear VS stats
-z -t/u VIP:VPORT -r RIP - clear RS stats
-Z/z - clear all stats
-C/-D/-d ... - clears all/some stats
What is the useful set of features?
In the kernel-user interface this can be achieved using wildcards
for the vs and rs fields in the user structure.
I assume -Z is for humans. Kernel 2.4?
> > > feature. It would be ipvsadm -Z as an analogy to ip{chains|tables}. BTW,
> > > we are proud of haveing 64bit counters in the kernel :)
> >
> > I'll make a big point of it in the HOWTO :-)
>
> We should maybe write something about cycling counters. This of course is
> not handled. I mean when exceeding the 64bits we start over by 1 IIRC and
> then we should set a flag to 1 to know that we already had 2**64 packets.
Who needs such flag? It takes years to set :) Or may be after
some years it will take months :)
> Best regards,
> ratz
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
|
