LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: lvs not workimg :(

To: Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: lvs not workimg :(
Cc: "'lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Radu-Adrian Feurdean <raf@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:20:15 +0200 (CEST)
On Fri, 25 May 2001, Julian Anastasov wrote:

> 
>       Hello,
> 
> On Thu, 24 May 2001, Radu-Adrian Feurdean wrote:
> 
> > > > IP Virtual Server version 0.9.0 (size=16777216)
> > >                                   ^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > >   Too much, it takes 128MB for the table only. Use 16 bits
> > > for example.
> >
> > Is this a hidden/undocumented problem with IPVS or it's just an observation 
> > of
> > memory waste ? (we use 18 bits in production)
> 
>       empty hash tables:
> 
>       18 bits occupy 2MB RAM
>       24 bits occupy 128MB RAM
> 
>       If the box has 128MB and the bits are 24 the kernel crash is
> mandatory, soon or later. And this is a good reason the virtual service
> not to be hit. Expect funny things to happen on box with low memory :)

Oops ! I forgot that not anyone uses 256Mb or more RAM on directors :) 
However, for me it makes sense to use up to 66% of total memory for LVS,
especially on high-traffic directors (in the idea that the directors doesn't
run all the desktop garbage that comes with most distros).


Radu-Adrian Feurdean
mailto: raf@xxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an approaching train.



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>