Re: mail farm?

lvs-users

Re: mail farm?

To:	lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Wensong Zhang <wensong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, michael_e_brown@xxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: mail farm?
From:	Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 04 Jun 2001 07:10:13 -0400

Wensong Zhang wrote:
> 
> Hi Michael,
> 
> I know that grouping multiple SMTP servers by DNS MX records long time
> ago. :-) 

SMTP servers need access to DNS for reverse name lookup. If they
are LVS'ed in a VS-DR setup, won't this be a problem?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: mail farm?, Joseph Mack <= Re: mail farm?, Matthew S. Crocker Re: mail farm?, Joseph Mack Re: mail farm?, Matthew S. Crocker LVS and RAID, Shain Miley Re: LVS and RAID, Matthew S. Crocker Re: LVS and RAID, Don Hinshaw RE: mail farm?, Bowie Bailey

Previous by Date:	Re: LVS-NAT only permitting first few connections, Joseph Mack
Next by Date:	Re: mail farm?, Matthew S. Crocker
Previous by Thread:	Problem with LVS-NAT-Default gateway., Schillaci
Next by Thread:	Re: mail farm?, Matthew S. Crocker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]