> Note that the feature of connection synchronization is under
> experiment
> now, and there is some performance penalty when connection
> synchronization, because a highly loaded load balancer may
> need multicast
> a lot connection information. If the daemon is not started, the
> performance will not be affected.
>
if one were to utilize this functionality with no worries about performance
penalties -- (let's imagine a real world case where the boxes / network /
memory / et cettera is just beefy enough to handle it) -- .. what would be
the best sync setting? or is it all automated?
another sweet feature for LVS :) ... now all that's missing is an ability to
handle proxy arrays (like AOL) better (?).. looks like 1.0 isn't too far
away!
-- side topic --
Has anyone given thought to getting https admin functionality like BigIP?
I'd do it myself except I'm quite poor at programming currently. :(
cheers,
Peter
|