LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: RH7.1 / 2.4.5 / ipvs

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RH7.1 / 2.4.5 / ipvs
Cc: "'nallen@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <nallen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, pmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:56:15 -0400
Peter Mueller wrote:

> as long as you make your clients on a completely different subnet you should
> be fine.

You _should_ be able to mix VIP-forwardingtype-clientnetwork LVS's
without any limitations (you'll have to make sure you get the
default gw's right for each service if you mix VS-NAT and VS-DR).

I haven't tried this myself, but since each VIP and set of
services has its own table(s), there is no reason it shouldn't
work

Joe
-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>