|
20 servers sounds like a number I have either read, or heard of before, but I
can't find it anywhere on the web site.
Anyway, thanks for the quick response.
Rob.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sam Mayes
>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 8:30 AM
>To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: Limitations
>
>
>I dont know what the exact limitations are, but I have played with
>1 lvs and
>20 real servers doing http using dr, and didnt have any issues. of
>course it
>wasnt production, but i was pounding it with ab just to try and
>break stuff.
>
>Sam
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:lvs-users-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Rob Leasure
>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 11:16 AM
>To: LVS Mailing List
>Subject: Limitations
>
>
>Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if there are any known limitations for LVS?
> In particular,
>I was wondering about the maximum number of servers I can have behind the
>LVS without any risk of failure.
>
>Rob.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
>
|
