Michael Stiller wrote:
>
> > there is never a default route setup for the director in VS-DR and it
> > shouldn't
> > have one.
>
> What about a real server local on the director ?
hmm I see. Yes it does, but hardly anyone seems to be doing
that so I forget about it.
> And i guess a default route doesn't hurt the director anyway ?
It enables the director to replyto requests from the outside world.
It doesn't need to do this for the LVS, and so you've added a security
hole.
Joe
--
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
|