lvs-users
|
To: | <lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
Subject: | foundry vs. lvs |
From: | "Jeremy Hansen" <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:35:14 -0400 (EDT) |
It seems my company has decided to go with foundry serveriron's for their load balancing solution. Of course I'd like to use LVS, mainly because the feature set they outlined is nothing LVS can't do and LVS is around $10,000 less expensive. Can anyone give me any positive or negative feedback on the foundry boxes and possible good arguments against using such a solution. I did look at the foundry feature set and it does seem to do a lot of really neat things, but I'm a linux bigot. -jeremy -- salad. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: how to do if I have different netmask, Michael E Brown |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: ldirectord feature request, Horms |
Previous by Thread: | vrrpd, Bjoern Metzdorf |
Next by Thread: | Re: foundry vs. lvs, Radu-Adrian Feurdean |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |