LVS
lvs-users
[Top] [All Lists]
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org
<prev [Date] next> <prev [Thread] next>

Re: foundry vs. lvs

from [Joseph Mack] [Permanent Link]
To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: foundry vs. lvs
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:02:25 -0400 
Jeremy Hansen wrote:
> 
> It seems my company has decided to go with foundry serveriron's for their
> load balancing solution.

Perceptions of the people with the money often count more than any technical 
issue.
So that we can add to our perceived features, what is it that your company likes
about the foundry box?

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: foundry vs. lvs, Radu-Adrian Feurdean
Next by Date:  Re: foundry vs. lvs, Alexandre CASSEN
Previous by Thread:  Re: foundry vs. lvs, Radu-Adrian Feurdean
Next by Thread:  Re: foundry vs. lvs, Alexandre CASSEN
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]