I think the error only means, that fping is not found. (What should
be a warning in my opinion).
You did not say if the setup works otherwise.
Oktay
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Malcolm Cowe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get a simple one network NAT setup to run on my testbed
> and I'm having difficulties getting it to work. I'm using RH 7.1 with
> the 2.4.7 kernel, patched with the 0.8.1 IPVS Netfilter module. This
> seems to be working and does load into the kernel:
>
> [epsg9008]root: ipvsadm
> IP Virtual Server version 0.8.1 (size=4096)
> Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
> -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
>
> [epsg9008]root: lsmod
> Module Size Used by
> ip_vs 57696 0 (autoclean) (unused)
> nfs 78960 2 (autoclean)
> lockd 49744 1 (autoclean) [nfs]
> sunrpc 66352 1 (autoclean) [nfs lockd]
> autofs 11264 6 (autoclean)
> eepro100 16560 1 (autoclean)
> aic7xxx 102608 3
> sd_mod 11200 3
> scsi_mod 91632 2 [aic7xxx sd_mod]
>
> I have modest requirements at this time, and want the cluster to run on
> the main subnet on my site. This means that the clients, director and
> real-servers must all reside on the same subnet. Additionally, there can
> only be one network card per unit in the cluster (directors and
> real-servers alike):
>
> +--------+ +----------+ +-------------+
> | Client | ... | Director | ... | Real-Server |
> +---+----+ +----+-----+ +------+------+
> | | |
> ----+-------------------+----------------------+-------
>
> Client IP: 156.141.59.181
> Director IP: 156.141.59.59
> Real-Server IP: 156.141.59.62
> VIP: 156.141.59.63
> Subnet: 255.255.248.0
> Gateway: 156.141.56.1
>
>
> I have been following the mini-howto to establish the lvs_nat.conf file,
> with references to lvs_dr.conf.one_NIC_one_network in the configure
> script, but I get a fatal error after running rc.lvs_nat on the
> director, telling me that my LVS is not set up properly. I have attached
> my lvs_nat.conf and the output from rc.lvs_nat, so you can see what I'm
> doing.
>
> Could you please help me figure out what's going wrong?
>
> Regards,
>
>
|