Re: Direct Routing from behind a firewall?

[Horms <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 03:48:14PM -0400, Matthew S. Crocker wrote:
> DR is faster, less resource intensive but has issues with configuration
> because of the age old 'arp problem'

This is true but LVS-NAT is still fast enough for many aplications and
is IMHO considerably easier to set up. While I think LVS-DR is great
I don't think people should be under the impresion that LVS-NAT
will intrisicly be a limiting factor to them.

-- 
Horms