LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: Problems with LVS-NAT and direct routing to network behind LVS.....

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Problems with LVS-NAT and direct routing to network behind LVS.....
From: Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:17:05 -0400
Pawel Kisiel wrote:
> 

> > I'm confused. You have both NAT and DR? Why do you differentiate
> > between in the internet and 10.10.0.0 in this diagram?
> I'm not doing LVS-DR on this linux box.... I'm only doing LVS-NAT for
> 10.10.1.0/24 network.... This 10.10.0.0/24 network is developers network
> in my company.....and LVS-NAT and 10.10.1.0/24 are in DMZ...
>         The network topology in this diagram  is familiar to real one in
> my company....and to DMZ I have normal direct routing...but clients from
> internet they have to have only access to LVS-NAT box.....
>         But as I wrote in my last e-mail ports that are mapped on LVS-NAT
> are no longer available for people from this private network.....

I'm still confused.
Please restate the problem without using the term "direct routing"
and with only 2 connections to the director.

Joe


-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>