Re: Problems with LVS-NAT and direct routing to network behindLVS.....

[Joseph Mack <mack.joseph@xxxxxxx>]

Zachariah Mully wrote:
> 
> Pawel-
>         I think that Joseph was confused by your use of "Direct Routing" which
> in the context of LVS means something totally different that what you
> intend.

It did.
I just went for my daily walk and I figured out what must be going on and
I came to your conclusion too.

the solution is to setup routes on the realservers so that packets to his DMZ 
are
routed directly to the DMZ and not through the director.

Joe

-- 
Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center, 
mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA