|
Joseph Mack wrote:
> Tim McAuley wrote:
>
> > I have some of the information about Level 7 switching, and was wondering
> > what other people thought of this? Has anyone used high level load balancing
> > and what do you think of it?
>
> it won't be ready for production in the time scale you're interested in.
>
> > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/Joseph.Mack/HOWTO/LVS-HOWTO-23.html#L7
> >
> > Currently our code (inherited... and needing redesign) uses cookies, which
> > would be stored on the individual servers. It is true that if these were
> > stored in the database, then the need for persistence is nullified, however
> > I'd prefer to explore all our options.
>
> if you want speed forget L7
>
After the test, we found that if the memory is enough, the performance of
ktcpvs is same as the ipvs(direct routing). Of cource, the director is only
for load balancing. I don't know why? CPU load is about 50%---- 80% on P3 933.
Zhao.
Best regards.
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Joseph Mack PhD, Senior Systems Engineer, Lockheed Martin
> contractor to the National Environmental Supercomputer Center,
> mailto:mack.joseph@xxxxxxx ph# 919-541-0007, RTP, NC, USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
|
