Re: a bug ?

[Djamil ESSAISSI <djamil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

sorry but just to make super-sure

so i replace the 1st line by the 2nd :
-        iph->ttl                =       old_iph_ttl;
+       iph->ttl                =       old_iph->ttl<20 ? old_iph->ttl+16 :

right ? :-)

On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 15:29:18 +0300 (EEST)
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote:

:)
:)      Hello,
:)
:)On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Djamil ESSAISSI wrote:
:)
:)> whould the TTL be a problem getting packets from client thru director
:)to RS with TUN ?
:)
:)      It is possible, I remember that someone reported for such
:)problem and even posted a patch:
:)
:)http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-virtual-server&m=98510049812412&w=2
:)
:)You are free to put this or similar patch into your tree.
:)
:)> i'm getting a "212.73.232.193 > 212.43.218.154: icmp: time exceeded
:)in-transit"  on the Director when doing a traceroute CIP from RS
:)pretending to be director.
:)
:)Regards
:)
:)--
:)Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
:)
:)
:)_______________________________________________
:)LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
:)Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
:)or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
:)


-- 
Djamil ESSAISSI
Tel:01.58.64.22.44 - Fax:01.58.64.26.81
Administrateur Systeme / Support Technique
www.francexpress.com - www.serveur-express.com