LVS
lvs-users
Google
 
Web LinuxVirtualServer.org

Re: a bug ?

To: lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: a bug ?
From: Djamil ESSAISSI <djamil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 18:48:51 +0200
well so far i finally got my hand on the bridge in front of the RS ;
18:28:23.410848 193.252.175.157.2611 > 212.43.218.155.23: SWE 
3724987732:3724987732(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 82328839 
0,nop,wscale 0> (DF) (encap)
18:28:26.398938 193.252.175.157.2611 > 212.43.218.155.23: SWE 
3724987732:3724987732(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 82329139 
0,nop,wscale 0> (DF) (encap)
18:28:32.410272 193.252.175.157.2611 > 212.43.218.155.23: SWE 
3724987732:3724987732(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 82329739 
0,nop,wscale 0> (DF) (encap)
18:28:44.401692 193.252.175.157.2611 > 212.43.218.155.23: SWE 
3724987732:3724987732(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 82330939 
0,nop,wscale 0> (DF) (encap)

it's BSD with ipf/altq ... played around with ipf for a while seems letting 
what we need go thru ...
but the RS still dont get one packet...
i even added a static route on the bridge as RS is gw to VIP <- this might be 
dumb, what can i say ?
1st time in my life i couldnt figureout a "network solution".


On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 16:56:02 +0300 (EEST)
Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> wrote:

:)
:)      Hello,
:)
:)On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Djamil ESSAISSI wrote:
:)
:)> net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_conn.c <- i found this file containing the
:)function not "ip_vs.c" which doesnt exist ...
:)> so it's at one line after "911"
:)
:)      I didn't tried it but the change looks logically correct. As
:)you see in the posting, the IPVS version or the Linux version are not
:)specified.
:)
:)> tests in progress -- BTW now it's not modules any more like you
:)requested ... so it takes me more time to reinstall ... ( make clean dep
:)bzImage ...)
:)
:)      It was only to debug the problem but it seems your distrib is
:)not setup to make correct symbolic output. Make sure that you apply
:)all patches (currently 2) after the module version of 0.9.5. The kernel
:)version has one of the fixes. You know, the 2nd is from today.
:)
:)Regards
:)
:)--
:)Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx>
:)
:)
:)_______________________________________________
:)LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
:)Send requests to lvs-users-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
:)or go to http://www.in-addr.de/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
:)


-- 
Djamil ESSAISSI
Tel:01.58.64.22.44 - Fax:01.58.64.26.81
Administrateur Systeme / Support Technique
www.francexpress.com - www.serveur-express.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>